Exposure management, secure architectures, security operations, and cyber resilience. AI threads through all four.

Written for CISOs of regulated enterprises. The framework can be applied broadly, but the specific recommendations assume a maturity floor. 

In this piece 

• The threat. The capability to discover previously undiscoverable zero-days is now shared across multiple frontier models. The responsible labs gated their releases. The ones who care less did not. The defender consequence is the same either way. 
• The asymmetry. AI-powered attackers operate with infinite parallel agents, sub-minute speed, comprehensive knowledge, and marginal cost approaching zero. Defender teams operate with 514K unfilled positions, 30-minute median triage, six to twelve month onboarding cycles, and flat budgets. 
• The framework. Four areas to rethink: Exposure Management, Secure Architectures, Security Operations, and Cyber Resilience. Using AI for security is no longer a nice-to-have. It is a required thread across all four. 
• Before Friday. Schedule the tabletop with legal, audit, and CAB. Pull the top fifty internet-facing assets into a single ASM view. Stand up an AI-aided code review pilot. None of this requires Glasswing access. 
• The scorecard. Four numbers reported quarterly to the board, one per shift. 

Mythos changes nearly everything about cybersecurity and AI. Read our whitepaper to get ahead of the changes.